Police withdraw 'trivial' $250 fine imposed on tourist operator

26/Sep/2012

Comments: 6 readers have left a comment

Good news at last for Ross Gundry. Good news at last for Ross Gundry.

EXCLUSIVE: WA POLICE will withdraw a $250 fine imposed on Swan Valley tourist operator Ross Gundry for using a mobile phone while driving a horse and wagon.

Assistant Commissioner Gary Budge, of Specialist Enforcement and Operations, said this morning while the Road Traffic Act was clear in its definition of a vehicle WA Police had reviewed the circumstances and decided “a caution could have been issued in the first instance.”

“As a result, the infringement will be withdrawn,” Assistant Commissioner Budge said.

The move came following detailed behind-the-scenes discussions between WA Police, Police Minister Liza Harvey and State Parliamentarians this week.

Ms Harvey said in a statement: “Any decision to withdraw an infringement is a decision for WA Police to make.”

Frank Alban, the Member for Swan Hills, also took up the matter with his State Government colleagues on Mr Gundry’s behalf.

Mr Gundry had already decided he would contest the fine in court.

The case would not have been without precedent.

In May, 2003, Melbourne tourist and horse-drawn cart operator Dean Crichton was fined by Victoria police for talking on his mobile phone while behind the reins. He contested the charge in the Magistrates Court, where it was quickly dismissed.

Magistrate Frank Jones described the charge as “trivial.”

“Technically you are guilty of the offence, but a horse and cart brings character to the streets,” Mr Jones said.

The magistrate told Mr Crichton: “The sooner you get back on your horse and cart and get the tourist dollar circulating in Melbourne again, the better.”

Assistant Commissioner Budge said in a statement it remains an offence to use a mobile phone when in control of a vehicle and the Road Traffic Act is clear that the definition of a vehicle includes “an animal being driven or ridden”.  

“All persons should recognise that being on a road demands full concentration and in this particular matter there were also passengers on the wagon,” he said.

“The infringement in this case was properly issued by the officer in accordance with current legislation.

“WA Police has since reviewed the circumstances and decided that a caution could also have been issued in the first instance. As a result, the infringement will be withdrawn.

“The discretion afforded on this occasion will not, however, extend to any future infringement.”

Bookmark and Share

What everyone else is thinking

Stanley

29/09/2012

Thinking again, stand back clear of these thoughts. Any of you thought about why the power of a vehicle is measured by the HORSE POWER of the engine. AND why isn't there one of those Nappy Poop Scoop bags attached to the rear of the horse under the drivers nose as he gose if he can not stop to pick it up because of the traffic :) Carts on the road like this do have reflectors so do the Police horses out on patrol at night.

Krystle

28/09/2012

Yes I agree a caution could have been issued and there should have been more communication regarding the change but having lived in the valley for almost 2 decades, I wish they'd do something about him dumping all the horse excrement he dumps on the road all the time.

Hugh Hyland

27/09/2012

I suppose next they will want seatbelts on wagons, helmets for riding, and lights and reflectors front and back for horses and carts................

gazza

27/09/2012

If a horse is a vehicle, then a [ metal] vehicle miust be a horse...
[ compliments of the logic department of the W.A. police SERVICE????
HOW ABOUT A BIT OF TRUTH IN LAW?

Gavin

26/09/2012

The police are not there to decide whether a fine or a penalty should be imposed. That is for the courts to decide. An infringement of the law is just that - Police shouldnt have the power to decide who gets fine and who doesnt. Does this also mean we will all get off with a warning on the first go ?

Randall

26/09/2012

A sensible decision really. Once Police officers were able to exercise the discretion or judgement required to see if an infringement for an offence is actually warranted rather than just saying"Well technically, in the absence of any real world context, you've committed an offence."

Share your thoughts in 60 seconds!

Members : login to comment


 

Wednesday 19 Jun 2013

  • Min 6°C
  • Max 19°C

Thursday

  • 6 - 19°C

Friday

  • 6 - 20°C

Featured Video Clips

Subiaco's Cinemas Project

Western Suburbs Weekly reporter Erienne Lette and City of Subiaco Mayor Heather Henderson talks about the new Cinemas Project.

Oliver Hill Gun Battery

Editor Denise Cahill talks with Harriet Wyatt about new conservation and restoration works being done to the Oliver Hill Battery.

Cat Haven Update

Western Suburbs Weekly editor Denise Cahill with this week's Cat Haven update.

Dog Refuge Update

Western Suburbs Weekly editor Denise Cahill with this week's Dog Refuge update.

email subscribe link
CommunityPix banner linkCarbonFootie