Kwinana firm favourite for future sheep exports

14/May/2010

Comments: 10 readers have left a comment

Wellard Rural Exports managing director Steve Meerwald at the Baldivis feedlots. Wellard Rural Exports managing director Steve Meerwald at the Baldivis feedlots.

ONE of Australia’s largest livestock exporters says moving sheep exports from Fremantle to Kwinana would be ideal.

Wellard Rural Exports managing director Steve Meerwald said the company, which has feedlots in Wellard and Baldivis, was waiting on an alternative to Fremantle.

Two proposals for Kwinana, including James Point Pty Ltd, Private Port on-shore facility, and Fremantle Ports, Kwinana Quay offshore facility, are currently under consideration by the State Government.

“It’s an ideal scenario... but realistically the majority of livestock should be moved from the Fremantle inner harbour,” he said. “It’s a tragedy that seven years down the track from when James Point was first proposed, we are not really any closer to it, no actual physical facility.”

Mr Meerwald said transport issues in Fremantle were becoming worse and Kwinana could easily cater for the livestock industry, which exported more than three million sheep from Fremantle last year.

“It’s much more efficient transport from our feedlots in Baldivis and Wellard, the roads are designed for trucks and it’s a much more livestock friendly transport route than through Leach and Canning Highway with stopping and starting and much heavier traffic,” he said.

“Realistically it’s put in the middle of a significant industrial area… loading could be done more efficiently and quickly with a faster turnaround.”

Despite opposition from the Town of Kwinana, Conservation of Rockingham group and Kwinana Progress Association, Mr Meerwald said the community would not even know a livestock ship was at the port.

“I don’t see it will have an impact other than some people having some perception thinking that it will. I don’t think people will know a ship is in,” he said.

“The feedlots are closer to the town that the port will be, and there are no significant issues from that.”

Mr Meerwald said the well-being of livestock would improve if shipping went through Kwinana because the time in trucks would be reduced.

“As soon as it (a port) is available, we are more than ready to use it,” he said.


Bookmark and Share

What everyone else is thinking

Karen

17/05/2010

Vic says the authorities can see what is going on with cctv, but the problem is nobody gives a damn about these animals so why would they even bother to look at the cctv, and with no inspectors around who else is going to bother..

barry

16/05/2010

Removing this appalling, indefensible industry from public scrutiny would allow the already demonstrated horrific cruelty of it to thrive unchecked. No-one who is humane and enlightened will support this move to Kwinana.

Shelly

16/05/2010

The Animal Welfare Unit was established as the lead agency in relation to livestock. In short this means that it was set up to be the first regulatory contact for any complaint or issue regarding compromised livestock. This structure was agreed to by the Department of Local Government, Department of Agriculture and Food and the Department of Environment and Conservation. The Unit had an Inspectorate; established in 2007, who were responsible for monitoring, education, support, inspection and enforcement of the Animal Welfare Legislation.

The current State Govt has decided that they will do the farmers bidding and all but destroy the Inspectorate. This means that NO animal from farm to your plate or export have been inspected by these Inspectors to ensure they have been humanely treated. The farming industry will claim they care and someone looks at the animals- it is less than the truth. Look at www.liveexportshame.com for more info on how you can help resinstate the inspectors.

Trish P

16/05/2010

Steve Meerwald knows very well that there is no official scrutiny of the treatment of animals in transport, at port and saleyards at the moment but at least live export is still in peoples awareness in Fremantle. He is hoping "out of sight out of mind" and if loading is moved to James Point, it won't be "livestock friendly", it will be open slather in the way animals are treated, without fear of being monitored and reported. The government has demonstrated that it is not interested in animal welfare with the dismantling the Animal Welfare Unit. The livestock industry has proven time and time again it is incapable of self regulation. It seems obvious that independent scrutiny and reporting is a nuisance to live export despite the fact that the farming, transport and live export lobbies have persuaded the politicians to make it easy for them.

Anne Stevens

16/05/2010

OK make the move BUT reinstate the Animal Welfare Unit inspectors - that way we know there is nothing to hide and it is a square playing field. I am sure you have the welfare of the animals always taking priority - now isn't that true??

sylvia raye

16/05/2010

This industry is so barbaric the only way it can survive is to be secretive. I hope these people rot in hell for what they do. The live trade should end. For the poor animals it is the dead trade

Shelly

16/05/2010

The animals have nothing to gain in terms of welfare. It may be fractionally shorter but their time on the trucks will remain the same-from between 30 mins to 3+ hours as they wait in all weathers to be unloaded. The REAL reason for the move is 'out of sight out of mind'. That is why the exporters are pushing for the shift because the benefit is to THEM. Live export is HATED by the majority of Australians because they know it to be cruel. Therefore if the exporters were to remove the trade from the eyes of the public, the problem disappears. Sue you have hit the nail on the head. There is no state or independant monitoring of their activities at the moment- and I suspect by relocating the trade the scrutiny will be impossible. Keep the stinking trade out of Kwinana; its is a shameful and embarrassing profit driven business. Vic, you have no idea of what you are talking about. What authorities? Exporters managed to get rid of the state AW inspectors - no one is there to prevent cruelty.

Vic Leventhal

14/05/2010

I have no problem with a sheep shipping facility in Kwinana. We have Oil, Fertilizer, Alumina plants giving work and service requirments to local people. So why not a shipping port. The sheep will have less stress, They I expect will still be Scroutinized by The Authorities, so easy now with CCTV. so I'm all in favour.

jennifer

14/05/2010

Typical of Mr. Meerwald attitude, of course he wants the livestock loading moved to Kwinana as he himself states nobody would even be aware of these ships in port. This is a barbaric industry and hiding it even more from public view is totally unacceptable. This industry should be totally removed from our shores that is the only acceptable answer.

sue

14/05/2010

I strongly object to moving it to Kwinana. I know why Wellard would like it to be Kwinana ... the no-one could see what goes on; no-one looking over their shoulder; no-one to answer to - how convenient.

Share your thoughts in 60 seconds!

Members : login to comment


 

Sunday 26 May 2013

  • Min 11°C
  • Max 24°C

Monday

  • 12 - 23°C

Tuesday

  • 13 - 21°C

Featured Video Clips

Subiaco's Cinemas Project

Western Suburbs Weekly reporter Erienne Lette and City of Subiaco Mayor Heather Henderson talks about the new Cinemas Project.

Oliver Hill Gun Battery

Editor Denise Cahill talks with Harriet Wyatt about new conservation and restoration works being done to the Oliver Hill Battery.

Cat Haven Update

Western Suburbs Weekly journalist Erienne Lette with this week's Cat Haven update.

Dog Refuge Update

Western Suburbs Weekly journalist Erienne Lette with this week's Dog Refuge update.

email subscribe link
CommunityPix banner linkCarbonFootie